Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research
  • Open Access

Xenopus embryonic epidermis as a mucociliary cellular ecosystem to assess the effect of sex hormones in a non-reproductive context

Frontiers in Zoology201411:9

https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-9994-11-9

  • Received: 26 August 2013
  • Accepted: 28 January 2014
  • Published:

Abstract

Background

How important are sexual hormones beyond their function in reproductive biology has yet to be understood. In this study, we analyzed the effects of sex steroids on the biology of the embryonic amphibian epidermis, which represents an easily amenable model of non-reproductive mucociliary epithelia (MCE). MCE are integrated systems formed by multiciliated (MC), mucus-secreting (MS) and mitochondrion-rich (MR) cell populations that are shaped by their microenvironment. Therefore, MCE could be considered as ecosystems at the cellular scale, found in a wide array of contexts from mussel gills to mammalian oviduct.

Results

We showed that the natural estrogen (estradiol, E2) and androgen (testosterone, T) as well as the synthetic estrogen (ethinyl-estradiol, EE2), all induced a significant enhancement of MC cell numbers. The effect of E2, T and EE2 extended to the MS and MR cell populations, to varying degrees. They also modified the expression profile of RNA MCE markers, and induced a range of “non-typical” cellular phenotypes, with mixed identities and aberrant morphologies, as revealed by imaging analysis through biomarker confocal detection and scanning electron microscopy. Finally, these hormones also affected tadpole pigmentation, revealing an effect on the entire cellular ecosystem of the Xenopus embryonic skin.

Conclusions

This study reveals the impact in vivo, at the molecular, cellular, tissue and organism levels, of sex steroids on non-reproductive mucociliary epithelium biogenesis, and validates the use of Xenopus as a relevant model system in this field.

Keywords

  • Cellular ecosystem
  • Ciliogenesis
  • Mucociliary epithelia
  • Sex steroids
  • Xenopus

Introduction

An ecosystem is defined as a biological system composed of all the organisms found in a particular physical environment, interacting with it and with each other [1]. Animal tissues can be considered as complex cellular ecosystems composed of different cell types that can be affected by mutual interactions as well as by the elements of their microenvironment. Under this perspective, the animal skin is particularly interesting because of its direct relationship with endogenous and exogenous environments. In aquatic animals with mucosal skin, the protective role of epidermis as a barrier includes the regulation of ionic homeostasis by mechanical, molecular and cellular processes that are common to non-epidermal ion-transporting mucosa. For example, the processes of membrane Na + trafficking by mitochondrion-rich (MR) cells via phosphorylation of the Na+,K+,2Cl- co-transporter (NKCC1) and the activation of apical anion-channels in skin, gills and kidney in marine fish species, are conserved in renal and airway epithelia of amphibians and mammals [2]. Moreover, structural features of animal mucosal epithelia are also remarkably similar along metazoan phylogeny and between organs. Mucociliary epithelia (MCE) have a minimal common cellular composition with mucus-secreting (MS) and multiciliated (MC) cells, and an additional population of MR cells featured with abundant microvili, ridges and/or apical vesicles, which play a role in the ionic/gas balance. This kind of MCE cellular ecosystem has been reported in numerous biological contexts from mussel gills to tetrapod oviducts [316] (Figure 1, Additional file 1). Xenacoelomorpha species also display MCE features, such as the larval and adult epidermis of Xenoturbella (Xenoturbellida), which is composed of MS cells and MC cells with abundant mitochondria and microvilli [17], and the planarian (Platyhelminthes, Turbellaria) epidermis composed of MC-MS cells and ion-sensitive cells [18, 19]. Multiple biological functions can be carried out by mucociliary epithelia, including the production of currents for food ingestion [3, 5] or gamete transport [15, 16], animal displacement [18], protection from exogenous noxious substances by mucus clearance [3, 13, 14] or mucus trapping [13], and ionic balance in response to serotonin [5] or gases [5, 19]. MCE features are also generated in non-physiological contexts, such as induced ciliogenesis via androgen/anti-estrogen stimulation in mammalian female prostate (skene glands) [20], and the bronchogenic/foregut cysts processes in liver, renal pelvis and other organs [21, 22].
Figure 1
Figure 1

Phylogeny of mucociliary epithelia. The scheme includes all taxa, which contain at least one species that has been reported to have a mucociliary epithelium formed by MC, MS and MR cell populations, or by intermediate cell types, independently of the organ or tissue context.

Regarding the MCE that constitutes the Xenopus (Amphibia) embryonic skin, its cellular arrangement includes (i) an outer-layer of MS (also called goblet) cells intercalated by MC and MR cells, and (ii) an inner layer of basal cells that serve as a reservoir of undifferentiated cells [11, 12]. The architecture of the frog MCE can be observed through bona fide markers of those cells types by in situ hybridization (ISH) and immuno-histochemistry (IHC), and by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) [11] (Figure 2A-C). Thus, it has been proposed as a model for studies aimed at comparing molecular and cellular principles of ciliated and transporting specialized epithelia [11, 23]. For example, miR-449 microRNAs were reported to be key regulators of multiciliogenesis, via repression of the Delta/Notch signalling pathway, in both the Xenopus embryonic epidermis and the human respiratory MCE [12]. Here, we take advantage of this frog MCE model to evaluate the role of sex hormones in a non-reproductive context.
Figure 2
Figure 2

Cellular arrangement within the mucociliary epithelium (MCE) of Xenopus embryonic epidermis and ectodermal explants. A,B) Typical MCE arrangement (skin st 30) with a layer of MS cells and interspersed MC and MR cells. Cell populations are marked by fluorescent ISH and/or IHC as follows MC cells (tuba1a-b, ac-Tuba), MR cells (atp6v1a), and MS cells (itln1, Itln1), and imaged by confocal microscopy. C) SEM micrograph of skin st 40 showing the MCE cellular arrangement with MC, MR (rMR and vMR) and a predominant amount of MS cells. D) Abundance of MC, MR and MS cell populations as identified by biomolecular markers in skin at st 30. E) Abundance of MC, rMR, vMR and MS cell populations as identified by SEM in skin at st 40. F-H) Specified (st 15, F) and differentiated (st 30, G,H) MCE in ectodermal explants showing a similar MC, MR and MS cellular arrangement to the MCE in the skin of whole-embryos; p63 (IHC) is a marker of inner-layer basal cells in the skin. A,B, H) 2 μm deep stack; F,G) single optical sections through the explants. H) surface view of the explant. MC, multiciliated; rMR or vMR, ridged or vesicle mitochondrion-rich; MS, mucus-secreting.

Sex steroids can drastically modify a microenvironment in reproductive organs, e.g. androgens may foster oncogenesis in prostate [24], and E2 may drive humanization of murine mammary glands [25]. Regarding the effects of sex steroids on MCE, it has been mostly studied in the oviduct tissue of tetrapods. It was reported that changes in ovarian hormones (E2, T and progesterone) transform MCE architecture and functionality linked to reproductive processes [15, 16]. Moreover, exogenous E2 or T was shown to enhance ciliogenesis in oviduct MCE [26, 27]. Whether these effects of sex steroids reflect a purely reproductive function or a more general impact on mucociliary cellular ecosystems remains an opened question. To address this question, we studied the effect of sex steroids on the epidermal MCE of Xenopus embryos. We assessed the effect of exogenous treatments with natural estrogen – estradiol (E2) – as the main active vertebrate estrogen, and testosterone (T) as the main vertebrate androgen, as well as the synthetic estrogenic compound – ethynyl-E2 (EE2), a broadly used contraceptive drug and a common pollutant of public concern because of its negative impact as an endocrine-disrupting compound (EDC). Here, it must be stressed that there is a rising number of reports about EDC pollutants, including natural sex hormones, present in surface waters, which can be bio-accumulated [28], and affect the wildlife and public health [2831].

Results

Characterization of epidermal MCE architecture and differentiation during embryonic development in Xenopus

In the outer layer of the differentiated epidermis of Xenopus embryos, confocal imaging of biomolecular markers specific for MS, MC and MR cells (Additional file 2) revealed a predominance of MS cells, which form a web-like layer (Figure 2A), with intercalating MC (Figure 2A,B) and MR cells (Figure 2B). This MCE arrangement was confirmed by SEM morphological analysis, which also allowed differentiating between ridged MR (rMR) and vesicle MR (vMR) cells (Figure 2C, Additional file 2). At st 30, the MCE is composed of 7-10% MC cells, 6-10% MR cells and 66-88% MS cells (Figure 2D). At st 40, there are 6-9% MC cells, 13-28% MR cells (6-14% rMR and 7-14% vMR cells) and still a large proportion of MS cells (59-82%) (Figure 2E). Thus, the MR cell abundance showed a 2-fold increase between st 30 and st 40. When naive ectoderm was explanted at the onset of gastrulation and cultured in isolation, the architecture of the MCE was comparable to that of the embryonic epidermis at equivalent developmental stages (Additional file 3). This similarity was evidenced by internal p63 (a marker of basal cells) staining, and an outer layer of MS cells intercalated by MC and MR cells (Figure 2F-H).

We then compared temporal expression profiles of relevant marker RNAs, such as (i) androgen receptor (ar), estrogen receptor 1 (esr1), esr2 and G-coupled protein receptor 30 (gpr30); (ii) the endocrine metabolism marker and plasma transporter, retinol-binding protein 4 (rbp4); (iii) the transcription factors related to MCE cell specification for MC cells (foxj1), MS cells (trim29) and MR cells (foxi1e); (iv) the multiciliogenesis regulator, the mature microRNA 449a (xla-miR-449a-5p); (v) the marker genes of differentiated MCE (Additional file 2), tubulin alpha 1a (tuba1a-b, MC), intelectin 1 (itln1, MS) and ATPase H + transporting V1 subunit A (atp6v1a, MR); (vi) the ABC transporter ion-channel, cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (cftr), which is an important ion transporter in vertebrate mucosal epithelia. All the RNAs analyzed by RT-qPCR were detected throughout st 10 (onset of gastrulation) to st 45 (onset of gonadal development) in whole embryos (Additional file 4). Remarkably, sex steroid receptor gene expression peaked at tailbud st 20, coincidentally with the increasing expression of MCE differentiation markers (Additional file 4). In differentiated epidermis, MCE differentiation markers and the sex steroid receptors, esr1 and ar, were enriched compared to whole embryo tissues at st 30 (Additional file 5). Furthermore, in explanted epidermis, all the markers, both MCE and endocrine related, were enriched in differentiated (st 25–30) vs. undifferentiated (st 11) MCE epidermis (Figure 3). This initial analysis suggested that the epidermal MCE, in early Xenopus embryos, is competent to respond to sex steroids.
Figure 3
Figure 3

Enrichment of marker RNAs related to sex steroid signalling and mucociliary epithelium differentiation in Xenopus embryonic epidermis. Comparative analysis of undifferentiated (U, st 11) and differentiated (D, st 25–30) MCE from ectoderm explants. RT-qPCR data from pools of 20 explants each. Levels of expression are expressed relative to odc1, except miR-449a-5p that is relative to RNU2. Mean ± SD (boxes) and 95% CI (whiskers), outliers are represented as dots. ND = non-detected, letter “b” denotes data significantly different from (U). Two-way ANOVA, Bonferroni comparison test, p < 0.05, d.f. = 3.

E2, T and EE2 effects on gross anatomical phenotype of Xenopus embryos

Exposure to E2, T or EE2 resulted in a dose-dependent increase of skin MCE pigmentation (Figure 4A), easily discernable from tadpole st 40. There was a general increase of melanophore numbers and of pigmented area, though T exhibited a weaker effect than the estrogens, E2 and EE2 (Figure 4B).
Figure 4
Figure 4

Effects of sex steroids on the gross anatomical phenotype of Xenopus embryos. A) Increase of pigmentation in the skin caused by E2, T and EE2 at indicated concentrations. Pictures of living anesthetized embryos at st 45; the percentages shown in the bottom left corner represent occurrence rates. Data are representative of 48 embryos/condition. B) Melanophore numbers and skin pigmented area associated to E2, T and EE2, compared to controls. Mean ± SD, “a” = control group; statistical significance is represented in a letter code: a indicates no difference with control, all other letters indicate significant difference with the control, shared letters indicate no significant differences between the corresponding data sets. One-way ANOVA, Tukey comparison test, p < 0.05, d.f. = 21. C) E2, T and EE2 induced overgrowth of gill branches (g, dashed lines); E2 and EE2 induced hypertrophy of blood vessels (arrowheads) in gill branches and cardiac anlage. B). Data are representative of 24 embryos/condition.

The anatomy of gill branches, which are fully covered by MCE, was clearly affected by sex steroids. The images from light microscopy (Figure 4C) and SEM (Additional file 6) showed that E2, T or EE2 induced a hypertrophy or an accelerated maturation of gills. This effect was observable from st 40, with the most obvious alterations in E2-treated embryos. The exposure to E2 and EE2 also induced a hypertrophy of blood vessels within the cardiac anlage and gill branches (Figure 4C). The overall development of treated individuals was otherwise normal, when body size, intestinal coiling and survival rate was assessed at late tadpole st 50. We next analysed specific MCE features in response to sex hormones.

E2, T and EE2 increase the abundance of MC cells in Xenopus embryonic MCE

All three sex steroids induced an increase in the number of MC cells, as revealed by SEM quantitative analysis at st 40 (Figure 5A). This effect exceeded the observed increase in the total number of cells in the MCE of treated embryos, suggesting a specific impact of the sex hormones towards MC cell biogenesis. The increase of MC cell abundance induced by E2, T and EE2 was confirmed by ISH (tuba1a-b as MC cell marker, Figure 5B) prior to (st 15) and after (st 30) MCE differentiation (Figure 5C,D). In the embryonic skin of whole embryos, EE2 stimulated a more pronounced effect at st 15 than E2 and T; however, after longer exposure (st 30), the effect was comparable for the three steroids (Figure 5C). The enhancement of MC cells by sex steroids was also apparent in epidermal explants (caps), and even more marked in this context than in whole embryos in response to E2 and EE2 (Figure 5D).
Figure 5
Figure 5

Effect of sex steroids on the abundance of MC cells in Xenopus mucociliary epithelium. A) Increase of MC and total cells by E2, T and EE2 in the skin outer layer of whole embryos st 40, SEM analysis, d.f. = 14. B) E2, T and EE2 increased the apparent density of MC progenitors prior to MCE differentiation (st 15), as revealed by tuba1a-b(+) chromogenic ISH. Images are representative of 24 embryos/condition. C-D) Increase of MC cells by E2, T and EE2 in whole embryos skin and ectodermal explants (caps), as measured by tuba1a-b (+) ISH staining of MC cells prior (st 15) and after (st 30) MCE differentiation, d.f. = 21. A,C,D) Mean ± SD, “a” = control group; statistical significance is represented in a letter code: a indicates no difference with control, all other letters indicate significant difference with the control, shared letters indicate no significant differences between the corresponding data sets. One-way ANOVA, Tukey comparison test, p < 0.05.

Sex steroids differentially affect the MCE cellular ecosystem

Sex steroids induced an increase of the total number of cells in the MCE, as measured by SEM at st 40 (Figure 5A, Additional file 7), and by DAPI nuclei staining at st 30 (Figure 6A), suggesting a potential impact on cell proliferation. In the interest of reproducibility, we analysed the skin over the trunk somites, where the response to sex steroids was less variable than on the abdomen, tail, head and fin areas. Using phospho-Histone H3 as a proliferation marker, it was shown that E2 consistently increased the amount of proliferative cells at both low and high concentrations (Figure 6B,C), whereas T and EE2 showed a dose-specific increasing effect on cell proliferation (Figure 6B). We next analysed the abundance of MC, MR and MS cells. E2 induced a dose-dependent increase of all three cell types at st 30 (Additional file 8) and st 40 (Additional file 7). Low and high doses of T increased the abundance of MC and MR, and to a lesser extent MS cell populations at st 30 (Additional file 8) and st 40 (Additional file 7). EE2 caused an increase of the amount of MC and MR cells at st 30 (Additional file 8), and of the amount of MC, rMR, and MS cells at st 40 (Additional file 7). vMR cell population abundance was affected only by low EE2 concentration (Additional file 7). To evaluate specific cell type enrichment in response to sex steroids, the proportion of each population was calculated as ratio to the total number of cells counted in each condition (Figures 6D,E). At late tadpole st 40, all three hormones caused a significant enrichment of MC cells (Figure 6E). E2 had no significant effects on the other cell types, except a slight decrease of MS cell percentage at st 40. Interestingly, both low and high T concentrations induced a very consistent enrichment of MR cells at st 30 and rMR cells at st 40 (Figures 6D,E). EE2 also increased MR cell percentage, though depending on the concentrations used. T and EE2 triggered a comparable decrease of MS cell percentage (Figures 6D,E). The percentage of vMR cells was not affected in any case.
Figure 6
Figure 6

Effects of sex steroids on the MCE cellular ecosystem. A,B) Effects of estradiol (E2), testosterone (T) and ethynyl-E2 (EE2) on the total cell abundance in MCE, based on DAPI nuclei staining (A), and on the total amount of proliferative cells (pH3 positive/field) (B). Analyses by confocal microscopy in embryos at st 30, d.f. = 21. C) Proliferative cells in E2 treated MCE from ectoderm explants. IHC for pH3 and DAPI. Confocal microscopy, 2 μm stack. Data representative of 18 samples/condition. D,E) Changes in cell population enrichment mediated by sex steroids in Xenopus epidermal MCE. Data based on the ratio of cell counting of each population over the total number of cells at st 30 (DAPI) (D) or st 40 (SEM micrographs) (E). Data are representative of 48 (st 30, Confocal imaging of molecular makers) or 24 (st 40) embryos by sex steroid treatment. +/++ concentrations = 1x10-7 M / 1x10-5 M. MC = multiciliated, vMR or rMR = vesicle or ridged mitochondrion-rich, MS = mucus-secreting cells. A,B,D,E) Baseline established for control group = 0. Mean ± SD, “a” = control group; Letter code: a indicates no difference with control, all other letters indicate significant difference with the control, shared letters indicate no significant differences between the corresponding conditions. One-way ANOVA, Tukey comparison test, p < 0.05. F) Disruption of cell population arrangement caused by EE2 in embryos at st 30. We observed an increase of MC (tuba1a-b, green) and MR (atp6v1a, red) cells, and the presence of adjacent MC cells. Double FISH and DAPI. Confocal microscopy, 2 μm stack, 24 embryos/condition. Right panels: Increase of the number of MC cells and disrupted epithelial architecture caused by EE2 SEM, st 40, 16 embryos/condition. G) Perturbed epidermal MCE arrangement and morphology provoked by T. SEM, st 40, 16 embryos/condition.

Sex steroids also perturbed cellular arrangement within the MCE. Notably, E2 and EE2 caused the appearance of adjacent MC cells, which never occurs in normal conditions (Figure 6F, Additional file 9B). SEM analysis also revealed a general disrupted epithelial morphology, which was most pronounced in EE2 (Figure 6F) and T (Figure 6G) treated embryos (see also Additional file 9).

Sex steroids alter the transcriptional expression of genes enriched in differentiated MCE and induce “non-typical” cellular phenotypes in the epidermis of Xenopus embryos

The effect of E2 on mRNA expression levels was generally weaker than those of T and EE2, as measured by RT-qPCR (Additional file 10). The three steroids showed a tendency to down-regulate the expression of endocrine signalling related markers. In contrast, the transcriptional expression of RNAs related to MCE differentiation was distinctly affected by each hormone. The effect of E2 was restricted to MR cell markers, with a slight inhibition of foxi1e and an enhancement of atp6v1a. However, in controls as well as in treated embryos, double ISH analysis revealed that those MR cell markers were always found co-expressed (Figure 7A). Interestingly, the atp6v1a/foxi1e ratio showed a marked increase in cells treated with E2 (Figure 7B). The same tendency was apparent in embryos treated with T and EE2, albeit with more variability in the latter case (Figure 7A,B). The other RNAs (tuba1a-b, itln1, foxj1a, trim29, miR-449a-5p and cftr) were not significantly modified by E2 treatments. For T and EE2, the effects were variable depending on the markers. Treatment with T tended to up-regulate tuba1a-b, miR-449a-5p (MC) and atp6v1a (MR) markers and down-regulate iltn1 and trim29 (MS) markers. Treatment with EE2 inhibited foxi1e and trim29 expression, whereas it enhanced miR-449a-5p and had no effect on tuba1a-b, atp6v1a, itln1 and foxj1a.
Figure 7
Figure 7

Sex steroids induced “non-typical” phenotypes in epidermal MCE of Xenopus embryos. A) Enhanced atp6v1a signal in MR cells treated with E2 or T. Staining: Double FISH for atp6v1a (green) and foxi1e (red), and DAPI, 2 μm stack. B) Quantification of atp6v1a enrichment based on the ratio of atp6v1a to foxi1e signal areas in single cells, d.f. = 69. C) Accumulative occurrence of “non-typical” phenotypes by condition. “Non-typical” phenotypes were not detected in controls. D) “non-typical” double itln1: tuba1a-b cell without cilia (arrow) in an EE2-treated embryo. Staining: Double FISH for itln1 (green) and tuba1a-b (red), IHC for ac-Tuba, and DAPI, 2 μm stack. E) “non-typical” double atp6v1a: tuba1a-b cell in a T-treated embryo, 2 μm stack. F,G) Orthogonal view of a normal MC cell (B) and “non-typical” double atp6v1a: tuba1a-b cell with internalized cilia in a T-treated embryo. B-D) Staining: Double FISH for atp6v1a (green) and tuba1a-b (red), IHC for cilia marker acetylated-tuba (ac-Tuba), and DAPI. H) Induction of proliferative MR and MC (dashed-line squares), and double atp6v1a: tuba1a-b cells (square). Staining: Double FISH for tuba1a-b (green) and atp6v1a (red), IHC for proliferation marker phospo-histone3 (pH3), and DAPI, 2 μm stack. A,D-H) Data from confocal microscopy imaging analysis. C-H) “non-typical” data corresponds to a screening of 64 embryos by condition. B,C) Mean ± SD, “a” = control group; statistical significance is represented in a letter code: a indicates no difference with control, all other letters indicate significant difference with the control, shared letters indicate no significant differences between the corresponding data sets. One-way ANOVA, Tukey comparison test, p < 0.05. MC = multiciliated, vMR or rMR = vesicle or ridged mitochondrion-rich, MS = mucus-secreting cells.

All sex steroids also caused a remarkable induction of “non-typical” cellular phenotypes. The occurrence of such aberrant phenotypes was higher in E2 than in T or EE2 treated embryos (Figure 7C). However, the impact on the overall tissue appeared to be stronger with EE2 and T than with E2 (Additional file 9, Figure 6F,G). There was a wide array of “non-typical” phenotypes based on molecular markers and morphological features (Additional file 11). Among them, we found intermediate MC-MS (Figure 7D) and MC-MR (Figure 7E) cells, abnormal MC-like cells with apparently internalized cilia or non-ciliated (Figure 7G), proliferative MC (pMC) and pMR (Figure 7H), and abnormal MS-like cells or grouped MR cells (Figure 6G).

Taken together, the collected evidence indicates that sex steroids cause profound defects in MCE architecture, cellular composition and molecular profiles.

Discussion

Here, we conducted a case study to assess the effects in vivo of sex steroids on MCE in a non-reproductive biological context. Taking advantage of the accessible MCE of tadpole epidermis, we have shown that sex steroids have a profound impact on normal MCE development. Notably, this study is the first to report that E2, T and EE2 increase the abundance of MC cell population in a non-reproductive MCE (Figure 5). Conversely, E2, T and EE2 induced strong transformations in the tadpole MCE resembling those caused by endocrine disruption in genital mucosal epithelia [15, 16, 27]. Furthermore, E2 and T effects detected at molecular, cellular and tissue levels in Xenopus embryos are comparable to EE2 effects, documenting the risk of E2 and T as potential EDCs for amphibians and other vertebrates.

In the physiological context, it has been shown that endogenous concentrations of E2 and androgen are naturally high in Xenopus laevis embryos before gonadal sex differentiation [32]. Moreover, we showed that sex steroid receptor genes have a prominent expression before the onset of sexual differentiation (Additional files 4 and 5) and that they are upregulated in differentiated MCE (Figure 3). Thus, we propose that sex steroid signalling could have a role during early development of Xenopus, independently of the reproductive system.

In sex steroid stimulated embryos, the overall developmental features were preserved. However, prominent and specific changes in skin pigmentation were observed (Figure 4). Consistent with these observations, previous studies showed that natural estrogens may affect melanin containing cells by increasing their abundance [33, 34], enhancing the tyrosinase activity [34, 35] and increasing the melanosome transfer via CFTR and ESRs signalling regulation [35]. CFTR expression was also shown to be regulated by estrogens in mucosal epithelia [36, 37], affecting pH, fluid volume and transport in the tissue [38]; in tadpole epidermis, we showed that cftr was upregulated by the synthetic EDC, EE2. Moreover, androgens have been linked to the regulation of mucosal pigmentation induced by anti-malarial drugs [39] and of tyrosinase activity in melanocytes via cell membrane signalling [40]. Our study thus suggests that skin pigmentation may be used as an obvious external parameter to assess endocrine stimulation. Moreover, the measurement of skin pigmentation together with the morphological analysis of gills and blood vessels appeared to be a good non-invasive test for a rapid diagnostic of endocrine disruption in amphibians.

The enhancement of MC cell abundance in Xenopus tadpole MCE by E2 (Figure 5A-D) indicates that E2 induces this typical response not only in the reproductive MCE of amniotic vertebrates [16, 26, 27]. This observation is also consistent with the loss of cilia induced by estrogen deficiency in the laryngeal mucosa of rats [41]. We found that the amount of MC cells is also increased by T and EE2 (Figure 5A-D), It has been shown that a T enhances ciliogenesis and MC cell amounts in female gerbils prostate mucosa [20], and that a natural increase of T and E2 is linked to more MC cells in oviduct epithelia of tetrapods [16]. Regarding EE2 effect on MC cells, there are some reports suggesting a possible association to ciliogenesis perturbation in endometrial tissues [42, 43] and in respiratory mucosa after long exposure to high doses [44]. Summarizing, the MC cell increase triggered by E2 or T in MCE of reproductive organs in amniotic vertebrates appears to be conserved in a non-reproductive amphibian tissue; effect that is also triggered by the synthetic steroid, EE2.

Our study revealed that E2, T and EE2 may affect the MCE cellular ecosystems in other aspects that the abundance of MC cells. E2 has a remarkable effect on MCE proliferative activity (Figure 6B,C), even in specified MC and MR cells (Figure 7H), which never occurs in normal conditions. Thus, it is likely that E2 perturbs MCE development through its effect upon proliferation and the resulting increase of cell abundance. E2-mediated increase of proliferative activity has also been shown on melanocytes [34], oviduct epithelia [26], respiratory mucosal endothelial cells [45] and mammary mucosal cells [25]. Conversely, T displayed more cell-type dependent effects. Strikingly, T caused a robust enrichment of MR cells (Figure 6D,E), in common with EE2 but not E2. Moreover, T and EE2 similarly disrupted the overall arrangement of the MCE cellular ecosystem in the tadpole skin (Figure 6F,G, Additional file 9A,F-I). Comparable to that overall disruption, in gerbil female prostate mucosa, T was shown to induce cell proliferation, tissue differentiation, secretory activity, dysplasia [46], enhanced ciliogenesis and MC cell differentiation [20].

Sex steroids consistently enriched the cellular expression of atp6v1a (Figure 7A,B), which encodes a mediator of intracellular acidification prior to endocytosis [47], suggesting a potential impact on cellular trafficking. In eukaryotic ciliated cells, endocytosis is one of the main mechanisms for internalization of ciliary components during recycling and removal of membrane material [48]. We suggest that in response to sex steroids, inappropriate endocytosis of cilia occurred in tuba1a- b(+) MC cells that ectopically expressed atp6v1a (Figure 7G). This view is consistent with multiple studies which showed enhancement of endocytic activity in response to endocrine stimulation via ATPases regulation and through multifunctional receptors [4952].

The three steroids induced a general transcriptional inhibition of sex steroid signalling receptors, which may be part of a mechanism to cope with excess of hormones and/or their derivatives, as suggested in other models [31, 53]. Consistent with this view, in tadpole st 20–38, AR and ESR lowest expression levels occurred at the time of E2 and androgen highest peaks [32]. Regarding rbp4, our results do not support its use as a marker to distinguish estrogenic and androgenic endocrine disruption in Xenopus laevis[29]. However, based on its expression, rbp4 may be involved in MCE differentiation, in agreement with its role in fish skin patterning [54] and the role of retinoid signalling during ciliogenesis and regeneration of respiratory epithelia [55].

A spectacular effect of sex steroids in our study concerned the induction of new cellular phenotypes revealed by marker gene and SEM analyses (Figures 6F,G and 7; Additional file 9). Similar phenotypes and mixed cell identities were reported before as part of reproductive endocrine related process in oviduct epithelia [15, 16], in human skene gland mucosa [56], and in stickleback fish nephritic tissues [57]. Altogether, suggesting a comparable effect among sex steroids on MCE cellular ecosystems at the cellular level. This may involve modifications of the extracellular environment [25, 58, 59] and/or increased cellular plasticity through inhibition of differentiation factors. In the frog skin, we note that sex steroids repressed the transcription factor foxi1e, which has a pivotal role during ectoderm differentiation, cell adhesion and migration [60]. We conclude that the appearance of “non-typical” cells is a useful parameter to assess the impact of EDCs on the frog MCE.

Integrating our results, it can be argued that sex hormones trigger dramatic but specific changes at the organism, cellular and molecular levels in Xenopus embryos (Figure 8). Differences between the responses driven by E2, T and EE2 could be due to multiple and distinct mechanisms, such as the regulation of specific sex steroid receptors, or the production of various metabolites resulting from sex steroids processing [31, 53]. However, it is probable that the common responses, such as enhanced pigmentation, overgrown gills, increased cellular proliferation and induction of “non-typical” phenotypes could be mediated by a multifunctional receptor with similar affinity for all three sex hormones. In this sense, membrane G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs), such as GPR30, which was similarly inhibited by E2, T and EE2, could be good candidates. GPR30 has been shown to be signalling in response to estrogens and androgens in multiple contexts [6164], although other GPCRs can mediate rapid and non-genomic responses to steroids in vertebrates [61, 62].
Figure 8
Figure 8

Overview of sex steroids impact on the mucociliary epithelium of Xenopus embryos.

In conclusion, we propose that the epidermis of Xenopus embryos can be used not only as a standard model of MCE cellular ecosystem, but also as a promising system for pathological and ecotoxicological assessments, and for comparative studies with other epithelial or mucosal tissue models.

Materials and methods

Ethics

All the experiments were performed following the Directive 2010/63/EU of the European parliament and of the council of 22 September 2010 on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes. All animal experiments were approved by the "Direction départementale de la Protection des Populations, Pôle Alimentation, Santé Animale, Environnement, des Bouches du Rhône" (agreement number E 13-055-21).

Embryos and ectodermal explants

Xenopus laevis embryos were obtained from lab-bred adults (Nasco) by in vitro fertilization, de-jellied and cultured in modified Barth’s solution (MBS) as previously described [12], with slight modifications to maintain constant culture conditions i.e. 18°C and 0.5× MBS. Developmental stages (st) were defined based on the Nieuwkoop and Faber X. laevis identification keys [65], though the equivalence in hours post-fertilization differed because of the culture temperature (Additional file 3). Embryos st 8–9 were dissected to obtain explants of the animal pole central area; explants were kept 30 min. in 1× MBS in glass-petri dishes to facilitate healing and closure, and subsequently cultured in the same conditions as sibling embryos.

Conditions for sex steroid treatments

The sex steroid hormones – E2 (17β-estradiol, Sigma), T (17β-Hydroxy-3-oxo-4-androstene, Sigma) and EE2 (17α-ethynyl-estradiol, Sigma) – were prepared following the same procedure. The hormones were directly resuspended in 0.5× MBS in an ultrasonic bath (Fisher Scientific 15046) to improve dissolution [31] at a final concentration of 1 × 10-4 M. Embryos and epidermal caps from st 10 were exposed to E2, T or EE2 at 1 × 10-7 M and 1 × 10-5 M by bath, kept at 18°C and collected at the timing equivalent for st 15, 30 or 40 (Additional file 3) as needed. Controls were incubated in 0.5× MBS and collected at the same time as treated embryos and ectodermal explants.

Samples collection and fixation

Prior to fixation, embryos at all the sampled stages were placed in glass vials and anesthetized with tricaine (also called MS-222 or ethyl 3-aminobenzoate methanesulfonate, Sigma) at 0.3 mg/ml in 0.5× MBS for at least 10 min. Explants were treated accordingly to keep identical conditions.

Embryos (st 15 and 30) for biomolecular marker staining were fixed with formaldehyde 4% v/v final concentration for 2 h, then placed in 100% ethanol for 1 h; both steps at room temperature (RT) with continuous soft agitation; embryos were then placed in fresh ethanol 100% at -20°C for at least 24 h and until needed. Embryos (st 40) for SEM were fixed in 3% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M phosphatase buffer pH 7.4 (19 ml monosodium phosphate 0.2 M and 81 ml disodium phosphate 0.2 M) made with filtered (0.22 μm) bi-distilled water, during 4 h with vigorous agitation, then washed with phosphatase buffer and filtered bi-distilled water, to be successively dehydrated in ethanol at 25, 50 and 70% for 30 minutes each; then, embryos were stored in fresh ethanol 70% at 4°C for 1–2 days before further processing.

Bright field microscopy observations

Embryos were regularly observed in bright field 1-10× magnification for the assessment of gross morphological phenotype. No obvious differences between sex steroid-treated and control embryos were detected regarding speed of development or deformities, except for changes in pigmentation, gill branches and blood vessels. To assess these changes, embryos at st 40 and 45 were anesthetized (as described above) for static imaging of embryos alive (Digital Sight DS-L2, Nikon), the resulting pictures were further analyzed.

SEM processing and imaging

Embryos in 70% ethanol were further dehydrated with vigorous agitation in ethanol once at 90% and twice at 100% for 30 minutes each; they were subsequently subjected to CO2 critical point drying (CPD030, Balzers) at 31°C and 73 atm. Finally, samples were sputter-coated with gold (vacuum 1×10-12 Torr, beam energy 3–4 keV) for immediate SEM digital imaging (S440, Leica) of the skin epidermis, to allow cell populations and tissue architecture analysis.

Fluorescent and chromogenic in situ hybridization (ISH)

Whole-mount chromogenic ISH was performed as previously referenced for X. laevis epidermal markers [11, 12, 66], with some modifications. All products and reagents were purchased from Roche or Sigma, unless stated otherwise. RNA probes were synthesized and labelled with digoxigenin (DIG) or fluorescein (FLUO) from plasmids containing the appropriate hybridizing sequences for the intended target genes tuba1a-b (gift from Christopher Kintner, Salk Institute for Biological Studies, U.S.), itln1 (gift from John Wallingford, University of Texas at Austin, U.S.), atp6v1a (gift from Nancy Papalopulu, University of Manchester, U.K.) and foxi1e; accession number of sequences are the same as for RT-qPCR primers (Additional file 12); sense probes were also synthesized and served as negative controls. Briefly, samples stored in ethanol at -20°C were progressively rehydrated in 75%, 50% and 25% ethanol in PBT (0.1% Tween 20 in 1× PBS), and then in PBT; they were then treated with 0.1 M triethanolamine (TEA) pH8 for 5 min. and 0.5% acetic anhydride in 0.1 M TEA for 10 minutes, and washed in PBT; they were then treated with proteinase K (PK) at 2 μg/ml final concentration for 8 min., washed with PBT and placed in bleaching solution (600 μl RNase free water, 325 μl H202, 50 μl formamide and 25 μl 20X SSC) under bright light, washed and re-fixed in formaldehyde 4% for 20 min. After that, samples were successively placed in HM hybridization mix (1% w/v Roche blocking agent, 25% 20X SSC, 50% Formamide, 0.01% heparin, 0.1% Torula RNA, 0.1% Tween 20, 0.1% CHAPS, 5 mM EDTA pH8, in bi-distilled water) 50% in PBS and HM 100%; samples were subsequently incubated with the respective probes in HM 100% at 60°C for 18 h. On day 2, samples were successively washed in HM 50% (in 2× SSC and CHAPS 0.1%) at 37°C, in 2× SSC and CHAPS 0.1% at 37°C, in 0.2× SSC and CHAPS 0.1% at 60°C, MABX (0.1% TritonX-100, maleic acid 0.1 M and NaCl 0.15 M) 50% in 0.2× SSC and CHAPS 0.1% at RT and, finally, in MABX. Embryos were then placed in blocking buffer (2% Roche blocking reagent, 10% fetal bovine serum and 5% DMSO in MABX) during 1.5 h and then incubated with anti-DIG or anti-FLUO labelling antibodies from sheep at 4°C for 18 h and washed with MABX.

For chromogenic ISH (CISH), TEA treatment was omitted. CISH was carried-out with alkaline phosphatase (AP) conjugated antibodies at 1:5000 in blocking buffer, and detected with 0.5× BM-purple substrate in water. Fluorescent ISH (FISH) was performed with horse-radish peroxidase (POD) conjugated antibodies at 1:500 in blocking buffer and detected with TSA Plus fluorescein or Cy3 kits (PerkinElmer) for FLUO or DIG tagged probes, respectively. Samples were incubated with the TSA substrate for 1 h and then washed with MABX; then, the reaction was stopped with 2% H2O2 in PBS for 0.5 h and washed in MABX. From TSA substrate addition until imaging, samples were kept protected from the light. For double ISH, the RNA probes were added at the same time, but the antibody and substrate reactions were performed sequentially. At the end, the stained samples were fixed with 4% formaldehyde in PBT for 0.5 h and, then, washed in PBT and processed for imaging or for additional staining.

Fluorescent immuno-histochemistry (IHC)

Whole-mount IHC was performed as previously referenced in X. laevis[11, 12, 66], with some modifications. After ISH staining, samples were placed in blocking buffer and, then, incubated with the respective primary antibody for marker proteins at the corresponding dilutions in blocking buffer for 1 h at RT and then for 18 h at 4°C. We used mouse monoclonal anti-acetylated-Tuba clone 6-11B-1 (T7451, Sigma) for cilia at 1:1000, mouse monoclonal anti-p63 (ab111449, Abcam) for basal cells at 1:100, mouse monoclonal anti-Itln1 (5G7 antibody, gift from Saguro Nagata, Japan Women’s University, Japan) for MS cells at 1:500, and rabbit polyclonal anti-phospho-Histone H3 (06–570, Upstate Biotechnology) for mitotic cells at 1:1000. Then, samples were washed 7 times in MABX for 1 h at RT and for 18 h at 4°C. After that, samples were placed in blocking buffer for 1 h at RT and, then, incubated for 3 h with the appropriate anti-rabbit or anti-mouse secondary antibody made in donkey, goat or chick and conjugated to Alexa-fluor 488, 555 or 647 (Invitrogen), as needed and with the concentrations indicated by the manufacturer. Finally, samples were washed and processed for imaging or for additional staining.

DAPI staining for nuclei

After ISH and IHC, and just before mounting, samples were placed in DAPI (Calbiochem) at 1 μg/ml final concentration in PBS for 15 min. at 4°C and then, washed two times with PBT for 1 h at 4°C.

Fluorescent and confocal imaging

Whole embryos were analyzed by bright field, fluorescent (MZ FLIII, ebq 100 mercury lamp, Leica) and macroconfocal (AZ-C2+, Nikon) microscopy for a general screening of the epidermal architecture and verification of staining quality. Then, epidermal tissue over somites was explanted and mounted with Fluoromount G (Fluoprobes) and let to dry at 4°C before confocal imaging (LSM780, Zeiss). The images were acquired as 8 bit/channel and 1024×1024 pixel resolution, and processed in Image J for max intensity Z-projection and/or merge of channels. The enhancement of atp6v1a was calculated as the ratio of atp6v1a to foxi1e signals by single cell, the measurements of area of atp6v1a and foxi1e were obtained separately using Image J. The setting for acquisition and image processing were maintained between samples of the same experiment.

Pigmentation measurements

Images from bright field microscopy observations were analyzed to assess changes in pigmentation that were quantified as 1) the number of melanophores on the abdominal area, by manual count and “find maxima” tool of Image J software [67], and 2) the total pigmented area, eyes and cement gland excluded, by using the Image J threshold tool. Both parameters were measured in embryos between st 40 and 45 when the pigmentation was sufficiently defined, so as to be detected by the software, although qualitative changes in the pigmentation were readily observable from st 38.

Analysis of RNAs expression by real-time PCR (RT-qPCR)

Tissue samples of whole embryos, ectodermal explants and embryonic skin were frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at -80°C for further processing. Total RNA was extracted using miRCURY RNA Isolation Kit - Tissue (Exiqon) and treated with DNase I (New England Biolabs) following manufacturer instructions. First strand cDNA synthesis was performed with SuperScript II RNase H– Reverse Transcriptase (Invitrogen) with oligo-dT12-18 primer from 1 μg of total RNA; for non-coding RNAs, synthesis was performed with miRCURY LNA Universal RT microRNA PCR, Polyadenylation and cDNA synthesis kit (Exiqon) from 200 ng of total RNA, all following manufacturer instructions.

RT-qPCR was performed with a CFX96 instrument (Bio-Rad) using SYBR GreenER qPCR SuperMix (Invitrogen) to analyze coding transcripts and miRCURY LNA SYBR Green master mix Universal RT (Exiqon) for non-coding RNAs. Transcripts analyzed were the endocrine related markers ar, esr1, esr2, gpr30 (also called G-coupled protein estrogen receptor, gper) and rbp4, and MCE related marker RNAs tuba1a-b, itln1 (also called Xenopus embryonic epidermal lectin, xeel), atp6v1a, cftr, foxj1, trim29, foxi1e and xla-miR-449a-5p.

SYBR Green reaction mixtures for coding transcripts were incubated for 10 min at 95°C, followed by 40 amplification cycles of 15 s at 95°C and 1 min at 60°C, and a final melting curve analysis verification (65 – 90°C, increment at 0.5°C/s). For non-coding RNAs analysis, the same settings were applied but with a ramp rate of 1.6°C/s during amplification cycling. The reference RNAs used were ornithine decarboxylase 1 mRNA (odc1, average Cq records 22 ± 1.1) for gene expression and small nuclear RNA U2 (RNU2, average Cq records 19 ± 0.7) for xla-miR-449a-5p expression. X. laevis specific primers were designed using the Primer-BLAST tool [68] from the sequence databases publicly available or selected from previous studies. Accession numbers, references and sequences are shown in Additional file 12. In all cases, each PCR was performed in triplicate and from at least two independent experiments. The quality of each couple of primers was tested, in all the cases the PCR product produced one single band of the expected size in Sight DNA Stain (Euromedex) 1% agarose gel, had ≥99% identity with the intended sequence, produced a single melting curve peak and had a linear curve efficiency with r > 0.95.

Estimation of MCE cell population features

Images from confocal microscopy of embryos at st 30 stained by double FISH and IHC of molecular markers, were used to estimate the cell population abundance based on the three main cell types (MC, MR and MS cells) that can be differentiated with this approach (Additional file 2). In all cases, tuba1a-b was used to estimate the number of MC cells, while other gene and protein markers were combined to obtain a set of overlapping staining to estimate the amount of the other cell types and specific features (examples in Figure 2). All these data were integrated to analyze the cell population abundance (amount of cells by field), and to assess the contribution of each cell type based on its enrichment with respect to the total number of cells (amount of DAPI stained nuclei). Furthermore, ac-Tuba and pH3 were used as markers to characterize additional features on the cellular activity. In addition, multiple marker staining was also used to identify “non-typical” cell phenotypes that were quantified as accumulated occurrence. This is a similar approach to the one previously described for assessing heterogeneous cellular responses to perturbations [69]. Complementarily, the images from SEM at st 40 were analyzed to assess cellular composition based on the typical structural features of each cell type (Additional file 2), to calculate the enrichment of each cell type, and for a qualitative assessment of the general architecture of the tissue.

Statistical analyses

Expression profiles in whole embryos were modelled from 4 data sets of independent batches of embryos with at least 20 embryos by stage (time-point) with overlapped sampling time-points from st 9–50, each time-point counting at least with 2 data sets; then, the spline-curve points ± 95% CI were calculated and plotted. Differences between time-points were analyzed by a two-way ANOVA and Bonferroni comparison test (p < 0.05). The Spearman correlation coefficient (r) and the respective p-value were calculated for each RNA marker vs. hours post hatching to estimate the changes in the expression levels associated to age (only significant for foxi1e (r < −0.6), miR-449a-5p (r > 0.8), cftr (r > 0.3), atp6v1a (r > 0.5) and rbp4 (r > 0.7) profiles) and those that are more specifically related to MCE differentiation mechanisms.

For comparative analyses of RNA expression profiles from RT-qPCR data, the levels of expression were normalized and, then, analyzed by two-way ANOVA and Bonferroni comparison tests (p < 0.05). The effects of sex steroids were represented as fold-change relative to controls. Comparative analyses for pigmentation and population dynamics were performed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s comparison tests (p < 0.05); the effects of sex steroids were represented as percentage-change relative to controls. In all cases, differences between groups were indicated by letters in the figures or tables. Different letters denote groups that are significantly different, e.g. data group “b” is different from data group “c”, whereas a dataset labelled as “bc” is not significantly different from data group “b” or from data group “c”. The letter “a” was used to denote data that are not significantly different from the reference or control group in each experiment. Data were analyzed using GraphPad Prism v.5 or R i386 2.15.2 [70].

Authors’ information

P.C-B.’s expertise is based on aquatic animal biomedicine with emphasis on its assessment at cellular and molecular levels, and using in silico, in vitro and in vivo approaches. P.C-B.’s scientific interests are focused on the study of potential regulators of mucosal epithelia biogenesis that are related to wound healing, immunity and endocrine control system.

L.K. has developed expertise in the role of signalling pathways during vertebrate embryonic development, using primarily Xenopus laevis as model system. L.K. has a keen interest in understanding ciliated epithelium biology from molecular, cellular and evolutionary point of views.

Abbreviations

MCE: 

Mucociliary epithelia

MC: 

Multiciliated cells

MR: 

Mitochondrion-rich cells

MS: 

Mucus-secreting cells.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We thank the Imaging Facility personnel at IBDM for their assistance with SEM and Confocal image acquisition, and Virginie Thomé for her technical assistance.

Financial support

This study was financially supported by Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale (FRM, P.C-B. fellowship), Aix-Marseille Université (AMU, P.C-B. fellowship); and Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR COMMIT, L.K. research grant).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Aix-Marseille Université, CNRS UMR 7288, IBDM, Campus de Luminy Case 907, 13288 Marseille Cedex 9, France

References

  1. Ecosystem, n.?: Oxford English Dictionary. [http://www.oed.com/view/Entry/59402]
  2. Marshall WS: Mechanosensitive signalling in fish gill and other ion transporting epithelia. Acta Physiol. 2011, 202: 487-499. 10.1111/j.1748-1716.2010.02189.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Beninger PG, Lynn JW, Dietz TH, Silverman H: Mucociliary transport in living tissue: the Two-layer model confirmed in the mussel mytilus edulis L. Biol Bull. 1997, 193: 4-7. 10.2307/1542730.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Holley MC: Cell shape, spatial patterns of cilia, and mucus-net construction in the ascidian endostyle. Tissue Cell. 1986, 18: 667-684. 10.1016/0040-8166(86)90069-8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Barreiro-Iglesias A, Aldegunde M, Anadón R, Rodicio MC: Extensive presence of serotonergic cells and fibers in the peripheral nervous system of lampreys. J Comp Neurol. 2009, 512: 478-499. 10.1002/cne.21914.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Zuasti A, Agulleiro B, Hernandez F: Ultrastructure of the kidney of the marine teleost Sparus auratus: the renal corpuscle and the tubular nephron. Cell Tissue Res. 1983, 228: 99-106.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Youson JH, Butler DG: Morphology of the kidney of adult bowfin, Amia calva, with emphasis on “renal chloride cells” in the tubule. J Morphol. 1988, 196: 137-156. 10.1002/jmor.1051960204.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Zaccone G, Mauceri A, Maisano M, Giannetto A, Parrino V, Fasulo S: Innervation and Neurotransmitter Localization in the Lung of the Nile bichir Polypterus bichir bichir. Anat Rec Adv Integr Anat Evol Biol. 2007, 290: 1166-1177. 10.1002/ar.20576.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Siegel DS, Sever DM, Aldridge RD: The pelvic kidney of male Ambystoma maculatum (Amphibia, urodela, ambystomatidae) with special reference to the sexual collecting ducts. J Morphol. 2010, 271: 1422-1439. 10.1002/jmor.10883.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Carvalho-Oliveira R, Saiki M, Pires-Neto RC, Lorenzi-Filho G, Macchione M, Saldiva PHN: Anti-oxidants reduce the acute adverse effects of residual oil fly ash on the frog palate mucociliary epithelium. Environ Res. 2005, 98: 349-354. 10.1016/j.envres.2004.10.002.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Dubaissi E, Papalopulu N: Embryonic frog epidermis: a model for the study of cell-cell interactions in the development of mucociliary disease. Dis Model Mech. 2011, 4: 179-192. 10.1242/dmm.006494.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Marcet B, Chevalier B, Luxardi G, Coraux C, Zaragosi L-E, Cibois M, Robbe-Sermesant K, Jolly T, Cardinaud B, Moreilhon C, Giovannini-Chami L, Nawrocki-Raby B, Birembaut P, Waldmann R, Kodjabachian L, Barbry P: Control of vertebrate multiciliogenesis by miR-449 through direct repression of the Delta/Notch pathway. Nat Cell Biol. 2011, 13: 693-699.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Fedde MR: Relationship of structure and function of the avian respiratory system to disease susceptibility. Poult Sci. 1998, 77: 1130-1138. 10.1093/ps/77.8.1130.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Tai S, Wang J, Sun F, Xutian S, Wang T, King M: Effect of needle puncture and electro-acupuncture on mucociliary clearance in anesthetized quails. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2006, 6: 4-10.1186/1472-6882-6-4.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Adams SM, Biazik J, Stewart RL, Murphy CR, Thompson MB: Fundamentals of viviparity: comparison of seasonal changes in the uterine epithelium of oviparous and viviparous Lerista bougainvillii (Squamata: Scincidae). J Morphol. 2007, 268: 624-635. 10.1002/jmor.10522.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. AlKindi AYA, Mahmoud IY, Woller MJ, Plude JL: Oviductal morphology in relation to hormonal levels in the snapping turtle, Chelydra serpentina. Tissue Cell. 2006, 38: 19-33. 10.1016/j.tice.2005.10.001.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Nakano H, Lundin K, Bourlat SJ, Telford MJ, Funch P, Nyengaard JR, Obst M, Thorndyke MC: Xenoturbella bocki exhibits direct development with similarities to Acoelomorpha. Nat Commun. 2013, 4: 1537-PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Almuedo-Castillo M, Salo E, Adell T: Dishevelled is essential for neural connectivity and planar cell polarity in planarians. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2011, 108: 3242-3253.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Weihrauch D, Chan AC, Meyer H, Döring C, Sourial MM, O’Donnell MJ: Ammonia excretion in the freshwater planarian Schmidtea mediterranea. J Exp Biol. 2012, 215: 3242-3253. 10.1242/jeb.067942.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Santos FCA, Falleiros-Júnior LR, Corradi LS, Vilamaior PSL, Taboga SR: Experimental endocrine therapies promote epithelial cytodifferentiation and ciliogenesis in the gerbil female prostate. Cell Tissue Res. 2007, 328: 617-624. 10.1007/s00441-007-0381-y.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. De J, Rossman L, Kott MM, Deavers MT: Cytologic diagnosis of ciliated hepatic foregut cyst. Diagn Cytopathol. 2006, 34: 846-849. 10.1002/dc.20572.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Gangane N, Anshu , Shende N, Sharma SM: Mucinous cystadenoma arising from renal pelvis: a report of 2 cases. Urol J. 2008, 5: 197-199.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Hayes JM, Kim SK, Abitua PB, Park TJ, Herrington ER, Kitayama A, Grow MW, Ueno N, Wallingford JB: Identification of novel ciliogenesis factors using a new in vivo model for mucociliary epithelial development. Dev Biol. 2007, 312: 115-130. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2007.09.031.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Cano P, Godoy A, Escamilla R, Dhir R, Onate SA: Stromal-epithelial cell interactions and androgen receptor-coregulator recruitment is altered in the tissue microenvironment of prostate cancer. Cancer Res. 2007, 67: 511-519. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-1478.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Fleming JM, Miller TC, Kidacki M, Ginsburg E, Stuelten CH, Stewart DA, Troester MA, Vonderhaar BK: Paracrine interactions between primary human macrophages and human fibroblasts enhance murine mammary gland humanization in vivo. Breast Cancer Res. 2012, 14: R97-10.1186/bcr3215.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Okada A, Ohta Y, Brody SL, Watanabe H, Krust A, Chambon P, Iguchi T: Role of foxj1 and estrogen receptor alpha in ciliated epithelial cell differentiation of the neonatal oviduct. J Mol Endocrinol. 2004, 32: 615-625. 10.1677/jme.0.0320615.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Sandoz D, Biosvieux-Ulrich E: Ciliogenesis in the mucous cells of the quail oviduct. I. Ultrastructural study in the laying quail. J Cell Biol. 1976, 71: 449-459. 10.1083/jcb.71.2.449.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Liu S, Ying G-G, Zhao J-L, Chen F, Yang B, Zhou L-J, Lai H: Trace analysis of 28 steroids in surface water, wastewater and sludge samples by rapid resolution liquid chromatography–electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr A. 2011, 1218: 1367-1378. 10.1016/j.chroma.2011.01.014.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Levy G, Lutz I, Krüger A, von Tümpling W, Kloas W: Retinol-binding protein as a biomarker to assess endocrine-disrupting compounds in the environment. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2004, 378: 676-683. 10.1007/s00216-003-2341-z.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Tompsett AR, Wiseman S, Higley E, Pryce S, Chang H, Giesy JP, Hecker M: Effects of 17α-ethynylestradiol on sexual differentiation and development of the African clawed frog (Xenopus laevis). Comp Biochem Physiol Part C: Toxicol Pharmacol. 2012, 156: 202-210. 10.1016/j.cbpc.2012.06.002.Google Scholar
  31. Castillo-Briceño P, Aguila-Martínez S, Liarte S, García Alcázar A, Meseguer J, Mulero V, García-Ayala A: In situ forming microparticle implants for delivery of sex steroids in fish: modulation of the immune response of gilthead seabream by testosterone. Steroids. 2012, 78: 26-33.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Bögi C, Levy G, Lutz I, Kloas W: Functional genomics and sexual differentiation in amphibians. Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol. 2002, 133: 559-570. 10.1016/S1096-4959(02)00162-8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Park CJ, Kang HS, Gye MC: Effects of nonylphenol on early embryonic development, pigmentation and 3,5,3′-triiodothyronine-induced metamorphosis in Bombina orientalis (Amphibia: Anura). Chemosphere. 2010, 81: 1292-1300. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.08.039.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Wiedemann C, Nägele U, Schramm G, Berking C: Inhibitory effects of progestogens on the estrogen stimulation of melanocytes in vitro. Contraception. 2009, 80: 292-298. 10.1016/j.contraception.2009.03.005.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Kim N-H, Cheong KA, Lee TR, Lee A-Y: PDZK1 upregulation in estrogen-related hyperpigmentation in melasma. J Invest Dermatol. 2012, 132: 2622-2631. 10.1038/jid.2012.175.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Rochwerger L, Dho S, Parker L, Foskett JK, Buchwald M: Estrogen-dependent expression of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane regulator gene in a novel uterine epithelial cell line. J Cell Sci. 1994, 107 (Pt 9): 2439-2448.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Singh AK, Schultz BD, Katzenellenbogen JA, Price EM, Bridges RJ, Bradbury NA: Estrogen inhibition of cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator-mediated chloride secretion. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2000, 295: 195-204.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Gholami K: In-vivo functional study on the involvement of CFTR, SLC26A6, NHE-1 and CA isoenzymes II and XII in uterine fluid pH, volume and electrolyte regulation in rats under different Sex-steroid influence. Int J Med Sci. 2013, 10: 1121-1134. 10.7150/ijms.5918.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Savage NW, Barber MT, Adkins KF: Pigmentary changes in rat oral mucosa following antimalarial therapy. J Oral Pathol. 1986, 15: 468-471. 10.1111/j.1600-0714.1986.tb00660.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Tadokoro T, Rouzaud F, Itami S, Hearing VJ, Yoshikawa K: The inhibitory effect of androgen and Sex-hormone-binding globulin on the intracellular cAMP level and tyrosinase activity of normal human melanocytes. Pigment Cell Res. 2003, 16: 190-197. 10.1034/j.1600-0749.2003.00019.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Tatlıpınar A, Güneş P, Özbeyli D, Çimen B: Effects of ovariectomy and estrogen replacement therapy on laryngeal tissue a histopathological experimental animal study. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011, 145: 987-991. 10.1177/0194599811423638.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Haibach H, Oxenhandler RW, Luger AM: Ciliated adenocarcinoma of the endometrium. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1985, 64: 457-462. 10.3109/00016348509155168.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Nayel SA, Gawad AA, Sibai FA, Ghanem AA, Ollo MM, Shams AT, Hebaish NA: Scanning electron microscopy of the human endometrium in pill users. Asia Oceania J Obstet Gynaecol. 1987, 13: 211-214.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. El-Ghazzawi IF, Mandour MA, Aziz MT, El-Heneidy AR: Changes in the lower respiratory epithelia induced by oestrogen intake. An experimental histopathological study. J Laryngol Otol. 1979, 93: 601-612. 10.1017/S0022215100087466.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Helmi AM, El Ghazzawi IF, Mandour MA, Shehata MA: The effect of oestrogen on the nasal respiratory mucosa. An experimental histopathological and histochemical study. J Laryngol Otol. 1975, 89: 1229-1241. 10.1017/S0022215100081597.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Santos FCA, Leite RP, Custódio AMG, Carvalho KP, Monteiro-Leal LH, Santos AB, Góes RM, Carvalho HF, Taboga SR: Testosterone stimulates growth and secretory activity of the female prostate in the adult gerbil (meriones unguiculatus). Biol Reprod. 2006, 75: 370-379. 10.1095/biolreprod.106.051789.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Thierry-Mieg D, Thierry-Mieg J: AceView: a comprehensive cDNA-supported gene and transcripts annotation. Genome Biol. 2006, 7 (Suppl 1): S12-10.1186/gb-2006-7-s1-s12.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Ghossoub R, Molla-Herman A, Bastin P, Benmerah A: The ciliary pocket: a once-forgotten membrane domain at the base of cilia. Biol Cell. 2011, 103: 131-144. 10.1042/BC20100128.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Plieschnig JA, Gensberger ET, Bajari TM, Schneider WJ, Hermann M: Renal LRP2 expression in man and chicken is estrogen-responsive. Gene. 2012, 508: 49-59. 10.1016/j.gene.2012.07.041.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Winter C, Schulz N, Giebisch G, Geibel JP, Wagner CA: Nongenomic stimulation of vacuolar H + −ATPases in intercalated renal tubule cells by aldosterone. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004, 101: 2636-2641. 10.1073/pnas.0307321101.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  51. Hofmeister MV, Damkier HH, Christensen BM, Olde B, Leeb-Lundberg LMF, Fenton RA, Praetorius HA, Praetorius J: 17β-Estradiol induces nongenomic effects in renal intercalated cells through G protein-coupled estrogen receptor 1. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2012, 302: F358-F368. 10.1152/ajprenal.00343.2011.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  52. Pirani T, Chen J, Vieira A: Effects of estradiol on the endocytic transport of vitamin D carrier protein in hepatocytes. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA). Gen Subj. 2013, 1830: 3421-3426. 10.1016/j.bbagen.2013.01.025.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. Aguila S, Castillo-Briceño P, Sánchez M, Cabas I, García-Alcázar A, Meseguer J, Mulero V, García-Ayala A: Specific and non-overlapping functions of testosterone and 11-ketotestosterone in the regulation of professional phagocyte responses in the teleost fish gilthead seabream. Mol Immunol. 2013, 53: 218-226. 10.1016/j.molimm.2012.08.002.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  54. Tingaud-Sequeira A, Forgue J, André M, Babin PJ: Epidermal transient down-regulation of retinol-binding protein 4 and mirror expression of apolipoprotein Eb and estrogen receptor 2a during zebrafish fin and scale development. Dev Dyn. 2006, 235: 3071-3079. 10.1002/dvdy.20921.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  55. Hwang PH, Chan JM: Retinoic acid improves ciliogenesis after surgery of the maxillary sinus in rabbits. Laryngoscope. 2006, 116: 1080-1085. 10.1097/01.mlg.0000224352.50256.99.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  56. Zaviačič M, Jakubovská V, Belošovič M, Breza J: Ultrastructure of the normal adult human female prostate gland (Skene’s gland). Anat Embryol. 2000, 201: 51-61.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. de Ruiter AJH: Testosterone-dependent changes in vivo and in vitro in the structure of the renal glomeruli of the teleost Gasterosteus aculeatus L. Cell Tissue Res. 1981, 219: 253-266.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  58. Castillo-Briceño P, Arizcun-Arizcun M, Meseguer J, Mulero V, García-Ayala A: Correlated expression profile of extracellular matrix-related molecules during the inflammatory response of the teleost fish gilthead seabream. Dev Comp Immunol. 2010, 34: 1051-1058. 10.1016/j.dci.2010.05.007.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  59. Castillo-Briceño P, Cabas I, Arizcun M, Meseguer J, Mulero V, García-Ayala A: Identification of a β1 integrin isoform with restricted tissue expression in a teleost fish. Reprod Fertil Dev. 2011, 23: 654-664. 10.1071/RD10351.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  60. Mir A, Kofron M, Zorn AM, Bajzer M, Haque M, Heasman J, Wylie CC: FoxI1e activates ectoderm formation and controls cell position in the Xenopus blastula. Development. 2007, 134: 779-788. 10.1242/dev.02768.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  61. Thomas P: Rapid steroid hormone actions initiated at the cell surface and the receptors that mediate them with an emphasis on recent progress in fish models. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2012, 175: 367-383. 10.1016/j.ygcen.2011.11.032.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  62. Sen A, Prizant H, Hammes SR: Understanding extranuclear (nongenomic) androgen signaling: what a frog oocyte can tell us about human biology. Steroids. 2011, 76: 822-828.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Goswami C, Kuhn J, Dina OA, Fernández-Ballester G, Levine JD, Ferrer-Montiel A, Hucho T: Estrogen destabilizes microtubules through an ion-conductivity-independent TRPV1 pathway. J Neurochem. 2011, 117: 995-1008. 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2011.07270.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  64. Gros R, Ding Q, Liu B, Chorazyczewski J, Feldman RD: Aldosterone mediates its rapid effects in vascular endothelial cells through GPER activation. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2013, 304: C532-C540. 10.1152/ajpcell.00203.2012.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  65. Nieuwkoop PD, Faber J: Normal Table of Xenopus Laevis (Daudin): A Systematical and Chronological Survey of the Development from the Fertilized Egg till the End of Metamorphosis. 1994, New York: Garland Publishing IncGoogle Scholar
  66. Marchal L, Luxardi G, Thomé V, Kodjabachian L: BMP inhibition initiates neural induction via FGF signaling and Zic genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009, 106: 17437-17442. 10.1073/pnas.0906352106.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  67. Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW: NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Meth. 2012, 9: 671-675. 10.1038/nmeth.2089.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  68. Ye J, Coulouris G, Zaretskaya I, Cutcutache I, Rozen S, Madden TL: Primer-BLAST: a tool to design target-specific primers for polymerase chain reaction. BMC Bioinforma. 2012, 13: 134-10.1186/1471-2105-13-134.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  69. Slack MD, Martinez ED, Wu LF, Altschuler SJ: Characterizing heterogeneous cellular responses to perturbations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008, 105: 19306-19311. 10.1073/pnas.0807038105.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  70. Team RC: R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. 2012, Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing,http://www.r-project.org/,Google Scholar

Copyright

© Castillo-Briceno and Kodjabachian; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate. Please note that comments may be removed without notice if they are flagged by another user or do not comply with our community guidelines.

Advertisement