Skip to main content

Table 4 Taxa misidentified with the NJ tree profile approach

From: Does the DNA barcoding gap exist? – a case study in blue butterflies (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae)

Agrodiaetus admetus(78–80)/demavendi(≈67)/nephohiptamenos (≈90)

Agrodiaetus ainsae(108–110)/fabressei(90)

Agrodiaetus alcestis(19–21)/dantchenkoi(40–42)/eriwanensis (28–32)/interjectus (29–32)

Agrodiaetus altivagans(18–22)/ciscaucasicus (16)

Agrodiaetus antidolus(42)/femininoides(27)/kurdistanicus (62)

Agrodiaetus arasbarani(25)/elbursicus (16)/lukhtanovi (22)/paulae(17)/zarathustra (≈22)

Agrodiaetus baytopi (27–28)/tankeri(20–21)

Agrodiaetus birunii(10–11)/brandti (19)

Agrodiaetus carmon(81–82)/surakovi (50)

Agrodiaetus ciscaucasicus (16)/mofidii(35)

Agrodiaetus cyaneus (19)/pseudoxerxes(15–16)

Agrodiaetus damone (66–68)/iphigenides(67)juldusus (67)/karatavicus (67)/phyllides(67)

Agrodiaetus elbursicus(17)/turcicolus (20)

Agrodiaetus hopfferi (15)/poseidon(19–22)

Agrodiaetus lorestanus (68)/ripartii(90)

Arhopala achelous/muta

Favonius cognatus/ultramarinus

Maculinea arion/arionides

Polyommatus amandus abdelaziz/Meleageria daphnis

Polyommatus cornelia/myrrhinus

  1. List of taxa which were misidentified with the NJ tree profile approach (excluding possible errors and critical taxa listed in Tab.3). Misidentified test taxa (in bold font) and their identifications are placed jointly in a single line. Haploid chromosome numbers of Agrodiaetus species (taken from [29, 30, 44]) are given in parenthesis.