Skip to main content

Table 3 Patterns of vertebrate class host co-feeding.

From: Blood feeding patterns of mosquitoes: random or structured?

Source

Site

C-score

Mean ± Variance

p < exp

p > exp

Pattern

Edman [37] Table 5

Single

0.058

0.478 ± 0.002

< 0.0001

1

Aggregate

Forattini et al [46] Table 3

Multiple

0.089

1.214 ± 0.0463

< 0.0001

1

Aggregate

Apperson et al [93] Table 1 (New York)

Multiple

0.967

0.858 ± 0.010

0.9332

0.0918

Random

Apperson et al [93] Table 1 (New Jersey)

Multiple

0.061

0.464 ± 0.009

0.0002

1

Aggregate

Savage et al [94] Table 1

Multiple

0.044

0.213 ± 0.004

0.0314

0.9816

Aggregate

Burkett-Cadena et al [91] Table 1

Single

0.509

0.526 ± 0.008

0.4196

0.6934

Random

Molaei et al [44] Table 1

Multiple

0.000

0.792 ± 0.003

< 0.0001

1

Aggregate

Hamer et al [47] Table 1

Multiple

0.000

0.415 ± 0.008

0.0006

1

Aggregate

Connecticut [43, 44]

Multiple

0.000

0.848 ± 0.002

0

1

Aggregate

Florida [37–42]

Multiple

0.028

0.635 ± 0.001

< 0.0001

1

Aggregate

  1. Source indicates the article and table within such article used for data extraction. Site describes single (adjacent) or multiple (non-adjacent) sampling sites in a given location. Values of the estimated C-score are the values calculated from the data, and Mean ± Variance are the results from the simulations. The values of p < exp and p > exp indicate the probability that the C-score value is significantly smaller (indicating aggregated pattern) or larger (segregated pattern) than that expected by random, with a p-value < 0.05 indicating statistical significance. When none of the p-values is below the threshold of 0.05 the pattern is random. Column "pattern" indicates the interpretation of the pattern.