Skip to main content
Fig. 4 | Frontiers in Zoology

Fig. 4

From: Performance of single and multi-atlas based automated landmarking methods compared to expert annotations in volumetric microCT datasets of mouse mandibles

Fig. 4

Comparison of the outlier detection performance in MAAP and TINA. For each landmark left column (M) is the result for MAAP and right column (T) is the result for TINA. Each data point represents the difference of the estimated landmark to the corresponding GS one. Horizontal line at five voxel mark represent the threshold specified to assess the outliers in both methods. For MAAP, if two or more of the templates (out of 10) were outside of this threshold range, the software flagged the landmark for manual verification. Green circle indicates landmarks that are correctly flagged as outliers, red circle indicates landmarks that are in reality outliers but missed by detection software, and blue indicates landmarks that were incorrectly flagged since they were below threshold

Back to article page

Frontiers in Zoology

ISSN: 1742-9994