Skip to main content

Table 3 Measured friction performance of whole tree frogs (top) and of single limbs/toe pads (bottom; SP unless stated otherwise). For explanation of abbreviations see Table 2

From: Tree frog attachment: mechanisms, challenges, and perspectives

Reference

Species

Friction F∥

Shear stress σ∥

F ⊥,L

v ∥

Remarks

  

[mN]

[mN mm −2]

[mN]

[µm s–1]

 

[40]

various hylids

5.5–585.7

—

—

—

PMMA

[71]

L. caerulea

285.4  ± 94.5

—

—

—

Glass

[6]

O. septentrionalis

24.9  ± 6.6–55.4 ± 6.3

—

—

—

SL

  

3.0–130.3

—

2.5

10–2500

 

[10]

R. pardalis

—

1.5

—

—

Glass

[25]

L. caerulea

—

1.08–2.01

0.1

500

Glass

[39]

R. dennysi

25.1–51.2

9.6

2

600

Varying detachment kinematics

[46]

H. versicolor

357.1

—

—

—

Pulling experiment, Frontlimbs

[53]

P. megacephalus

17.52

—

3

300

Glass

[80]

T. resinifictrix

110–1270

—

—

—

Jumping kinematics, Wood; SL

[97]

L. caerulea

—

7.8  ± 12.9

2

1000

Resin

  

—

5.9  ± 2.6

  

PDMS

[113]

L. caerulea

1.6–10.4

—

—

—

SL

[112]

P. megacephalus

14.5–122.7

—

—

—

Repeated sliding

  1. F⊥,L normal load, v∥ sliding speed